1. Under the statutory definition of "joint work," what is the key point that must be proven to establish a work as a "joint work"? 2. What is the two-part test for determining intent, set forth in Childress and adopted by the court in Thomson v. Larson? 3. What evidence did the court find to be important in determining intent in this case? 4. What issue of law did the court leave open and not decide in this case? 5. If you had been representing Thomson during the settlement negotiations, would you have advised her to accept the 2% author's royalties offered by the Larson heirs? Why or why not? Support your conclusion with facts from the case