1. Until recently, Chris Compeet worked as one of three physicians at Ortho-Med, the only orthopedic medical practice in the town of Metropolis that provides the fitting and physical therapy support for prosthetic limbs. Upon joining Ortho-Med Chris signed an employment contract. One of the provisions of his contract, often called a "restrictive covenant" or "non-compete covenant," stated that, if Chris were to leave Ortho-Med, he agreed not to open his own medical practice of any kind within the state of Lone Star (in which Metropolis is located) that would compete with Ortho-Med. Chris is licensed to practice medicine only in the State of Lone Star.

A few weeks ago, Chris had a falling out with the other two physicians at Ortho-Med, and he decided to leave the practice. He moved to Sin City, located 250 miles away and also in the State of Lone Star, where he opened a plastic surgery practice called The Chop Shop. In addition to plastic surgery, Chris occasionally fits a prosthetic limb in his Chop Shop offices. Chris' former colleagues at Ortho-Med caught wind of Chris' new practice and decided to sue him for breaching the restrictive covenant contained in his Ortho-Med employment contract.

Assume that there is no statutory or case law on professional restrictive covenants in Lone Star, so you'll need to rely on secondary sources to piece together your legal argument.

1. Locatethe three sections of the appropriate Restatement that are most applicable to the problem.

1. Locate 2 law journals or law review articles that address the topic.

2. What is a law review? What is the difference between a law review and a law journal?

3. List the types of annotations available in a Restatement.