1. Using John Rawls' definition of "civil disobedience," could civil disobedience be justified in a legal system where there is a formal rule of law? If so, what stronger duty could override the duty to obey the law in such a system? If not, why not?

2. Use the necessity defense to explain what a pro tanto moral duty to obey the law is. Illustrate your explanation by applying the necessity defense to a case where someone violates a traffic law that prohibits running a red light.

3. Given that the U.S. is expected to be a constitutional democracy, what is an argument against judicial review based on democratic legitimacy? Also, what argument is there in favor of judicial review based on constitutional legitimacy?