1. What is the level of measurement of each variable? 2. Which one is the possible independent variable? 3. What is R2? What does it mean that R2=0.20? 4. What is the direction and the strength of the relationship? ents 5. Provide a logical possible explanation of the relationship? The USA seems to be an outlier. How could you explain that? 3 Government Expenditure on Health vs. Control of Corruption High Solomon Islands . Marshall Islands North Korea . Kiribati. Czech Republic . Luxembourg .Cuba Sweden urces Eq. Guinea . Angola . Tonga Maldives Germany . 60 80 100 Brunei . . . Japan France . Finland . Malawi " Turkmenistan . Namibia . Dominic Andorra . Australia Zambia . . . . Thailand . Netherlands . Russia. .St Lucia Grenada . Switzerland Government Expenditure on Health (% of total health) . Peru . . . Chile . Haiti . Benin. Kyrgyzstan . . . . Cyprus . USA . South Africa Zimbabwe . Eritrea China. Morocco . Vietnam Nepal . Uruguay 20 40 . Singapore Nigeria . Iraq Guineadia Azerbaijan Afghanistan O Low -2 -1 0 2 3 High Corruption Control of Corruption Low Corruption R2=0.20 Sources: WHO (2001-2002), World Bank (2002-2008) Data runs by: Richard Svensson