1. What must a plaintiff show to establish copyright infringement? 2. What must be shown by a plaintiff to establish "substantial similarity"? 3. What is de minimis use? What are the qualitative and quantitative components and what about them prevented the court from deciding the de minimis use issue? 4. What is the fair use doctrine? How was it applied here? 5. Did the court get this case right? Should tattoo artists receive copyright protection for the reproduction of their tattoos on athlete avatars in video games? How about reproductions featured in movies or in fictional works broadcast on television? Include legal reasoning in your decision;