1. What would happen if breaking and entering just once in a lifetime were allowed universally according to the categorical imperative?

A. People would stop buying valuable thing living their lives with items that are not worth stealing and lowering their quality of life and standard of living, thus creating a contradiction of the will.

B. People would end up spending exorbitant amounts of resources to produce iron clad methods to prevent anyone from breaking and entering, thus creating a contradiction of the will.

C. People would arm themselves with guns so they can shoot people who try to break in resulting in a lot more cases of manslaughter, thus creating a contradiction of the will.

D. People would stop locking their doors since they are expecting people to break into their homes, arming themselves with guns because it would be legal to shoot anyone on your property, thus creating a contradiction in conception

2. Suppose I do not want to give treats on Halloween. I want to turn off the lights and pretend I'm not home. What would running this action through the categorical imperative produce according to Kant?

A. Contradiction of the will

B. none of these

C. Violation of duties

D. Contradiction in conception

3. Which one signifies that the action in question is not morally permissible according to the categorical imperative?

A. produces contradiction in conception.

B. goes against social norms

C. any of these

D. produces the worst consequences.

4. How does lying by omission lead to a contradiction of the will according to the categorical imperative?

A. If everyone were allowed to lie by omission, it would produce grave consequences for society.

B. If everyone were morally allowed to lie by omission, you would not be able keep secrets or deceive by omitting information.

C. If everyone were allowed to lie by omission, people would stop trusting each other.

D. If everyone were allowed to lie by omission, it would become illegal.