Question
1. When a Court 'distinguishes' precedent, the court is not questioning the correctness of the previous decision.True or False. Explain your reason. 2. Judges don't
1. When a Court 'distinguishes' precedent, the court is not questioning the correctness of the previous decision.True or False. Explain your reason.
2. Judges don't make law - they simply interpret the existing law. It is the Parliament's role to change bad laws. Do you agree with this statement? Discuss your reasons.
3. What is the doctrine of stare decisis? What is the underlying rationale for this legal doctrine?
4. Is obiter dictagenerally considered to be binding? Are there any circumstances when obitermay be relied upon as precedent?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Constitutional Law Cases And Materials
Authors: Jonathan Varat, Vikram Amar, Evan Caminker
16th Edition
1647083613, 978-1647083618
