1. Which of the following is a proximate cause?

a. When the injuries to the plaintiff are not the foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct.

b.If an injury would not have occurred but for the defendant's conduct.

c.A cause that is foreseeable and "not too remote."

d.An event that is a "breach of the duty of due care" on the part of the defendant. (i selected this but it is not correct)

e.A defense to a plaintiff's action where the plaintiff has knowingly entered into a risky activity that results in injury.

2. Which of the following best defines "res ipsa loquitur"?

a. It makes a presumption that the defendant has engaged in ultra-hazardous activities.

b. It means that the defendant's negligence is presumed based on the facts of the case.

c. It refers to a case where defective products create an unreasonable risk of injury to consumers or others.

d. It is an award of money damages to make the plaintiff whole.

e. It refers to actions of the defendant that violates an ordinance. (I selected this but it is incorrect)