1. Why didn't the U.S. Supreme Court provide/use similar findings as the Stambovsky v. Ackley case to provide a fair result for Ms. O'Connor under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the O'onnor v. Davis case?

2. What fundamental principle of the three-branch system of government constrained the Court's decision in the O'Connorv. Davis?

3. How did that differ from the options available to the court in Stambovsky v. Ackley case?

4. From an ethical and PR point of view, how should the CEO of a hospital responded to Ms. O'Connor's complaint?

Reference for the finding must be included.

.