1) Why do we create issue statements in statutory interpretation? 2) What do we mean by a "distinction" in an issue statement? How can we identify the distinction in an issue statement? 3) What do we mean by a "neutral element" in an issue statement? How can we identify the neutral element in an issue statement? 4) Do we use the same structure and wording in framing our issue statements for a noun, verb, adjective and adverb? If not, how might you word an issue statement for a noun and a verb differently? 5) Do we label our limbs in our issue statements? What should the labels contain? 6) Why is it important that we state the issue using the same word in the legislation, in the same sense and same part of speech? 7) Why do we generalise our issue statements away from the facts? What does this even mean? 8) Does the wide limb have to include the narrow limb? Dictionary 1) Why do we look at the dictionary in statutory interpretation? 2) Should you repeat the entire dictionary entry for the issue word when asked to "state the relevant dictionary definition"? 3) What does it mean to say a word is being used in a different 'part of speech'? Give several examples. 4) Should you include dictionary definitions that are in a different part of speech from the issue word? 5) Where should you look in determining which part of speech the issue word is in? 6) What does it mean to say a word is being used in a different 'sense'? [i.e. what does "sense" mean?] How is this similar or different to a 'part of speech'? 7) Should you include dictionary definitions concerning a different sense of the issue word when stating the relevant dictionary definition? Give three examples where the same word is used in a different sense. 8) Should you include colloquial entries in the dictionary definition when stating the relevant dictionary definition? (what even IS a "colloquial entry"?) 9) Should you include legal entries in the dictionary definition when stating the relevant