1-1) Steven and Paul sign a contract whereby Paul promises to wash Steven's car once a week for $80 per month. The terms on the back of the contract were in very small print, contained excessive legalese, and required Paul to also cook dinner for Steven every day, do his laundry, and clean his apartment. Paul later takes another look at the contract involving work for Steven and tells Steven that the contract is outrageous. Which of the following would be a possible defense to Steven's and Paul's contract involving chores based upon the size of the print and excessive legalese on the back of the contract?

Group of answer choices

Substantive unconscionability

Unclear drafting

Procedural unconscionability

Outrageous wording

Adhesion conscionability

1-2)

Steven and Paul sign a contract whereby Paul promises to wash Steven's car once a week for $80 per month. The terms on the back of the contract were in very small print, contained excessive legalese, and required Paul to also cook dinner for Steven every day, do his laundry, and clean his apartment. Paul later takes another look at the contract involving work for Steven and tells Steven that the contract is outrageous. Which of the following would be a possible defense to Steven and Paul's contract involving the harsh and lopsided terms in the contract involving chores?

Group of answer choices

Substantive unconscionability

Unclear drafting

Procedural unconscionability

Outrageous wording

Adhesion conscionability