Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
11-12 (DepreciationSL, DDB, SYD, Act., and MACRS) On January 1, 2013, Locke Company, a small machine-tool manufacturer, acquired for $1,260,000 a piece of new industrial
11-12 (DepreciationSL, DDB, SYD, Act., and MACRS) On January 1, 2013, Locke Company, a | |||||||
small machine-tool manufacturer, acquired for | $1,260,000 | a piece of new industrial | |||||
equipment. The new equipment had a useful life of | 5 | years, and the salvage value | |||||
was estimated to be | $60,000 | . Locke estimates that the new equipment can produce | |||||
12,000 | machine tools in its first year. It estimates that production will decline by | ||||||
1,000 | units per year over the remaining useful life of the equipment. | ||||||
The following depreciation methods may be used: | |||||||
(1) Straight-line, | |||||||
(2) Double-declining balance, | |||||||
(3) Sum-of-years'-digits, and | |||||||
(4) Units-of-output. | |||||||
For tax purposes, the class life is | 7 | years. | |||||
Ues the MACRS tables for computing depreciation. | |||||||
(MACRS stands for modified accelerated cost recovery system. MACRS is what is required for tax purposes.) | |||||||
Instructions: | |||||||
Prepare the depreciation expense for Locke Company using several straight-line, double declining balance, MACRS and MACRS straight-line option. Sum-of-the-year's-digits and units-of-output methods have been done for you. | |||||||
(1) Straight-line: | Cost | Amount | |||||
Salvage value | Amount | ||||||
Depreciable value | Formula | ||||||
Life | Number | ||||||
Annual depreciation expense | Formula | ||||||
Year | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | |||||
2013 | Formula | Formula | |||||
2014 | Formula | Formula | |||||
2015 | Formula | Formula | |||||
Formula | |||||||
(2) Double-declining balance: | |||||||
Year | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | |||||
2013 | Formula | Formula | |||||
2014 | Formula | Formula | |||||
2015 | Formula | Formula | |||||
Formula | |||||||
(3) Sum-of-the-years-digits: | |||||||
Year | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | |||||
2013 | $400,000 | $400,000 | [(5/15) $1,200,000] | ||||
2014 | 320,000 | 720,000 | [(4/15) $1,200,000] | ||||
2015 | 240,000 | 960,000 | [(3/15) $1,200,000] | ||||
$960,000 | |||||||
(4) Units-of-output: | |||||||
Year | Expected Output | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | ||||
Cost | $1,260,000 | 2013 | 12,000 | $288,000 | $288,000 | ||
Salvage value | 60,000 | 2014 | 11,000 | $264,000 | 552,000 | ||
Depreciable value | 1,200,000 | 2015 | 10,000 | $240,000 | 792,000 | ||
Expected life output | 50,000 | 2016 | 9,000 | $792,000 | |||
Unit depreciation expense | $24.00 | 2017 | 8,000 | ||||
Total units | 50,000 | ||||||
(5) Which depreciation method (MACRS or optional straight-line) would minimize net income for income tax reporting for the 3-year period ending December 31, 2015? Determine the amount of accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2015. Ignore present value considerations. | |||||||
6) Think about the expense recognition principle. Under that key principle, expenses are matched to the period in which revenue is recognized. In about five sentences, discuss when you would use each of the methods, if you desired to closely match expense with revenue. | |||||||
7) General MACRS method: (Values taken from the MACRS rates schedule.) | |||||||
Total Cost | MACRS Rates (%) | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | ||||
2013 | 1,260,000 | 14.29% | = | Formula | Formula | ||
2014 | 1,260,000 | 24.49% | = | Formula | Formula | ||
2015 | 1,260,000 | 17.49% | = | Formula | Formula | ||
Formula | |||||||
Optional straight-line method (uses half year convention, no salvage values) | |||||||
Total Cost | Depreciation Rate | Annual Depreciation | Accumulated Depreciation | ||||
2013 | 1,260,000 | (1/7 X 1/2) | = | Formula | Formula | ||
2014 | 1,260,000 | 1/7 | = | Formula | Formula | ||
2015 | 1,260,000 | 1/7 | = | Formula | Formula | ||
Formula | |||||||
8) What differences do you notice between general MACRS and straight-line computed in #1 above? | |||||||
Assume that Locke Company uses straight-line for financial reporting and general MACRS (not optional | |||||||
straight-line) for tax purposes. How will using MACRS for tax purposes affect the timing of the amount of | |||||||
taxes that Locke Company pays? Do you think that timing difference should create a liability for Locke? | |||||||
| |||||||
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started