12. Defendant from New Jersey was involved in an accident with Plaintiff from North Carolina in New Jersey. Before filing his action against Defendant, Plaintiff learned that Defendant just inherited real estate in North Carolina. Plaintiff decided to begin his action in North Carolina and did so by attaching Defendant's property, consistent with the state law of North Carolina. Based on these facts, does Plaintiff's assertion of jurisdiction violate the Constitution? A. The assertion of jurisdiction violates due process because Defendant did not own the property at the time of the accident. B. The assertion of jurisdiction does not violate the Constitution because this is a form of quasi in rem jurisdiction. C. The assertion of jurisdiction violates due process because the property has nothing to do with the underlying lawsuit. D. The assertion of jurisdiction does not violate the Constitution because the attachment of the property is authorized under the Full Faith and Credit Clause