12. How broad a power of judicial review did the Court claim in Marbury v. Madison? What did the Court mean by: "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." Does that statement broaden or narrow the claimed scope of judicial review?

16. By the time the Court decided Marbury, existing Supreme Court precedents included the decisions regarding the Hayburn and Todd applications for Revolutionary War pensions (in Chapter 3) and Calder v. Bull (in Chapter 3). Did Marbury extend judicial review beyond those precedents? If so, how?

1. Why, according to the Flast court, did the plaintiffs not have standing?
2. What is the distinction between tax appropriations and tax expenditures made by the majority? Do you agree with this distinction?
3. Do you think the Flast exception still exists?