Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

12.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's

12.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. Which statement is correct?

A. Jacqueline committed no crime if she puts the money back before it is discovered missing.

B. The government can initiate a criminal case against her for embezzlement.

C. The government can initiate a criminal case against Vop for embezzlement.

13.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. In a criminal case against Jacqueline, what is the burden of proof?

A. Clear and convincing evidence.

B. Beyond a reasonable doubt.

C. Probable cause.

14.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. Jacqueline has been charged with a felony offense. Which statement is correct concerning Jacqueline's right to a jury trial?

A. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial provided it is an action in equity.

B. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if the possible punishment exceeds one year in prison.

C. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if the possible punishment exceeds five years in prison.

D. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if there is probable cause that the judge may be biased.

E. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial.

25.) When Ken comes home from work one day, his neighbor Nick is waiting for him. "Your lawn is a mess," says Nick, "and you really should do something about it." Ken says, "I'm going on vacation tomorrow. Can you get someone to do a nice job on the lawn for me?" Nick says, "Sure." Nick hires Carlos, a professional landscaper, to fix up Ken's lawn and yard. When Ken returns, Carlos presents him with a bill, which was a reasonable amount. Ken says that he never authorized Nick to promise that Ken would pay this amount. Is Ken obligated to pay Carlos?

A. Yes, because of Nick's incidental authority.

B. Yes, because of Nick's ratification authority.

C. Yes, because of Nick's estoppel authority.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Evidence

Authors: Chris Taylor

5th Edition

1292210192, 978-1292210193

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

5. Give examples of binary thinking.

Answered: 1 week ago