Question
12.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's
12.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. Which statement is correct?
A. Jacqueline committed no crime if she puts the money back before it is discovered missing.
B. The government can initiate a criminal case against her for embezzlement.
C. The government can initiate a criminal case against Vop for embezzlement.
13.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. In a criminal case against Jacqueline, what is the burden of proof?
A. Clear and convincing evidence.
B. Beyond a reasonable doubt.
C. Probable cause.
14.) Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. Jacqueline has been charged with a felony offense. Which statement is correct concerning Jacqueline's right to a jury trial?
A. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial provided it is an action in equity.
B. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if the possible punishment exceeds one year in prison.
C. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if the possible punishment exceeds five years in prison.
D. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial if there is probable cause that the judge may be biased.
E. Jacqueline has the right to a jury trial.
25.) When Ken comes home from work one day, his neighbor Nick is waiting for him. "Your lawn is a mess," says Nick, "and you really should do something about it." Ken says, "I'm going on vacation tomorrow. Can you get someone to do a nice job on the lawn for me?" Nick says, "Sure." Nick hires Carlos, a professional landscaper, to fix up Ken's lawn and yard. When Ken returns, Carlos presents him with a bill, which was a reasonable amount. Ken says that he never authorized Nick to promise that Ken would pay this amount. Is Ken obligated to pay Carlos?
A. Yes, because of Nick's incidental authority.
B. Yes, because of Nick's ratification authority.
C. Yes, because of Nick's estoppel authority.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started