Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

12 Mathematics for Finance Assumptions 1.1 to 1.5 as well as the No-Arbitrage Principle extend readily to this case. The forward price F is determined

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
12 Mathematics for Finance Assumptions 1.1 to 1.5 as well as the No-Arbitrage Principle extend readily to this case. The forward price F is determined by the No-Arbitrage Principle. In par- ticular, it can easily be found for an asset with no carrying costs. A typical example of such an asset is a stock paying no dividend. (By contrast, a com- modity will usually involve storage costs, while a foreign currency will earn interest, which can be regarded as a negative carrying cost.) A forward position guarantees that the asset will be bought for the forward price F at delivery. Alternatively, the asset can be bought now and held until delivery. However, if the initial cash outlay is to be zero, the purchase must be financed by a loan. The loan with interest, which will need to be repaid at the delivery date, is a candidate for the forward price. The following proposition shows that this is indeed the case. Proposition 1.2 Suppose that A(0) = 100, A(1) = 110, and S(0) = 50 dollars, where the risky security involves no carrying costs. Then the forward price must be F = 55 dollars, or an arbitrage opportunity would exist otherwise. Proof Suppose that F > 55. Then, at time 0: . Borrow $50. . Buy the asset for S(0) = 50 dollars. . Enter into a short forward contract with forward price F dollars and delivery date 1. The resulting portfolio (1, --, -1) consisting of stock, a risk-free position, and a short forward contract has initial value V(0) =0. Then, at time 1: . Close the short forward position by selling the asset for F dollars. . Close the risk-free position by paying = x 110 = 55 dollars. The final value of the portfolio, V(1) = F - 55 > 0, will be your arbitrage profit, violating the No-Arbitrage Principle. On the other hand, if F 0, which once again violates the No-Arbitrage Principle. It follows that the forward price must be F = 55 dollars. Exercise 1.5 Let A(0) = 100, A(1) = 112 and S(0) = 34 dollars. Is it possible to find an arbitrage opportunity if the forward price of stock is F = 38.60 dollars with delivery date 1? Exercise 1.6 Suppose that A(0) = 100 and A(1) = 105 dollars, the present price of pound sterling is S(0) = 1.6 dollars, and the forward price is F = 1.50 dollars to a pound with delivery date 1. How much should a sterling bond cost today if it promises to pay f100 at time 1? Hint: The for- ward contract is based on an asset involving negative carrying costs (the interest earned by investing in sterling bonds). 1.6 Call and Put Options Let A(0) = 100, A(1) = 110, S(0) = 100 dollars and s(1) = 120 with probability p, 80 with probability 1 - p, where 0

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Quantitative Investment Analysis

Authors: Richard A. DeFusco, Dennis W. McLeavey, Jerald E. Pinto, David E. Runkle

3rd edition

111910422X, 978-1119104544, 1119104548, 978-1119104223

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Were the participants sensitized by taking a posttest?

Answered: 1 week ago