125% T View Zoom Insert Table Chart Text Shape Media Comment Collaborate Format Document Click to enlarge or reduce the view of the document. Determining Adverse Impact: Practice The book, the Q&A from the EEOC, and Supplemental Guide 1 all highlight the critical importance of knowing the definition of "Adverse Impact" and knowing how to determine if it exists in any situation. Here's a little exercise to reinforce your learning. Background: Lame Duck Airlines (LDA) is a major air carrier based in the United States. It hires hundreds if not thousands of people each year. As such, the Federal Government closely monitors its compliance with EEO laws. Each year, LDA must report the results of its hiring to the Department of Transportation. Last year, the airline provided the DOT information about its hiring practices that included: Ethnicity Applicants Hired Selection Rate White (non-Hispanic) 3120 1872 Hispanic 1986 960 Black 1004 500 Asian 88 362 Nothing selected. The brand new compliance officer for the airline did not complete the last column of the Select an object or text to format. table because they argued that the government could see that the airline wasn't discriminating simply by looking at the number of people it hired from each ethnic group. Your assignment: a. Complete the Table for the airline. Fill in the four empty cells above! b. Based on your additional data, place an "X" in the most appropriate space below. I agree with the compliance officer. LDA is not discriminating I disagree with the compliance officer. LDA is discriminating I don't know if LDA is discriminating. There's more work to be done C. Justify your choice. This should take no more than three or four sentences if you are succinct and if you address the professional/scientific principles underlying your choice. By the way, only one of the three choices IS CORRECT; the other two are totally unjustifiable from a professional/scientific perspective, given the information at your disposal. Type your answer in the space provided below