13. a. Police Officer Paul apprehends a wanted criminal and then demands the $10,000 reward offered by Crime Stoppers. Which of the following statements is true? Police Officer Paul is not entitled to the reward because past consideration is never valid consideration. b. Police Officer Paul is entitled to the reward because he puts his life on the line every day. Police Officer Paul is not entitled to the reward because he was under a pre-existing duty to make the c. arrest. d. Police Officer Paul is not entitled to the reward but may have an argument under promissory estoppel. 14. Walter worked nights as a clerk in a fast-food store. On his last work shift, Walter's boss told him, "I'm really grateful for the year that you have worked here. I am going to give you a bonus of $1,000 in your last paycheck." When Walter got his last paycheck, there was no bonus. If Walter sues, the likely result will be: Walter will win, as the promise is enforceable. b. Walter will lose, as he gave no consideration. Walter will lose unless the promise was in writing. d. Walter will win, as no consideration is required to modify an employment contract. a. c