14.1Comparing Pension Plan Features

LG4

Linda Calloway and Meredith Perdue are neighbors in Charleston. Linda works as a software engineer for Progressive Apps Corporation, while Meredith works as an executive for Industrial Container Company. Both are married, have two children, and are well paid. Linda and Meredith are interested in better understanding their pension and retirement plans.

Progressive Apps Corporation, the company where Linda works, has a contributory plan in which 5 percent of the employees annual wages is deducted to meet the cost of the benefits. The firm contributes an amount equal to the employee contribution. The plan uses a five-year graded vesting procedure; it has a normal retirement age of 60 for all employees, and the benefits at retirement are paid according to a defined contribution plan.

Industrial Container, where Meredith works, has a minimum retirement age of 60. Employees (full-time, hourly, or salaried) must meet participation requirements. Further, in contrast to the Progressive Apps plan, the Industrial Container program has a noncontributory feature. Annual retirement benefits are computed according to the following formula: 2 percent of the employees final annual salary for each year of service with the company is paid upon retirement. The plan vests immediately.

Critical Thinking Questions

1. Discuss and contrast the features of the retirement plans offered by Progressive Apps and Industrial Container.

2. Which plan do you think is more desirable? Consider the features, retirement age, and benefit computations just described. Which plan do you think could be subject to a conversion to a cash-balance plan sometime in the future? Explain. Include in your answer the implications for the employees future retirement benefits.

3. Explain how you would use each of these plans in developing your own retirement program.

4. What role, if any, could annuities play in these retirement programs? Discuss the pros and cons of using annuities as a part of retirement planning.