Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. In Griess & Sons v. Farm Bureau Insurance (30., the loss of the hogs caused by
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. In Griess & Sons v. Farm Bureau Insurance (30., the loss of the hogs caused by Windstorm was a covered loss. In a "pure" comparative fault jurisdiction, the plaintiff cannot recover for any of his loss if any fault is attributed to the plaintiff. The assumption of risk defense applies to inherent risks associated with a particular activity. Under a Good Samaritan Law, a person finding another person in peril is required to render aid. The trend from some time now in manufacturer liability litigation is that such cases are decided on the basis of strict liability rather than negligence principles. A manufacturer has a duty in some jurisdictions to warn of foreseeable misuse. FIFRA regulates farm worker safety protection requirements. When a farmer buys a product and then alters or modifies it, doing so will likely prevent that farmer from suing the manufacturer on a products liability claim if the product fails. In Kansas, farmers have a right to set controlled fires on their property for ag purposes and will not be held liable for damages if the fire is set and managed with ordinary care under the conditions
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started