15. It's the year 2525, and climate change is forcing humanity to consider abandoning Earth. There are two options for continuing human life. Option 1 is to use one large spaceship that will take all of humanity to a relatively large planet. Option 2 is to send two smaller spaceships that will take half of humanity each to two smaller planets. One key consideration in the debate is that the two smaller planets are too far from each other to eectively communicate. Another consideration is that the combined agricultural land on the two smaller planets is greater than the amount of agricultural land on the large planet. Based solely on these two considerations, which option would be most attractive to a person convinced by the ideas of Malthns and not Kremer? (You should assume that experiencing a bad situation later is better than experiencing it sooner.) A.) Option 1 would be most attractive. 13.) Option 2 would be most attractive. C.) Both options would be equally attractive. D.) Neither option would clearly be better than the other without more information