15copies

Northeastern does not challenge the legality of the invalidated tariff. It contends instead that the protective couplers were intentionally overdesigned, making them unnecessarily expensive and subject to break down. In particular, Northeastern complains that the couplers required an external power source^[5]and that they had six-wire leads while Northeastern's PBXs were designed for two-wire interconnection. These features, Northeastern maintains, unreasonably hampered its efforts to compete in the business terminal equipment market.

Northeastern instituted the present suit in 1975, alleging that SNET, in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2, had monopolized and had attempted to monopolize the business terminal equipment market in Connecticut.^[6]Appellee charged further that SNET, AT&T, and Western Electric had conspired to monopolize that market, also in violation of 2, and had conspired to restrain trade, in contravention of 1, 15 U.S.C. 1.

Question 1

Is there any role for heparin in management of septic shock?

Question 2

Is there more adrenaline (epinephrine) or noradrenaline (norepinephrine)

produced in shock? From where do these substances come from?

Question 3

I hear conflicting views as to whether activated protein C is useful in

shock.

Question 4

Why does both vasoconstriction and vasodilatation occur in shock?

Question 5

Are pulmonary artery (PA) catheters dangerous?

Question 6

In most hospitals, what is the difference between a high-dependency

unit (HDU) and an intensive care unit (ITU) and what is 'step down'

care?

Question 7

What is the difference between acute lung injury (ALI) and acute

respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from a practical point of view?

Question 8

What is the role of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) in acute respiratory distress

syndrome (ARDS)?

Question 9

What is meant by 'positive' pressure ventilation?

Question 10

Why is an electroencephalogram (EEG) not used in all countries to

evaluate possible brain death.