16-? Profit Corporation authorized Anderson, an employee, to find a buyer for used equipment that Profit intended to sell. Anderson believed that he had authority to contract for the sale of the equipment, but in fact he did not. Anderson found a prospective buyer, Caveat Corporation, and connected with Caveat on behalf of Prot for the sale of the equipment to Caveat. In this contract, Anderson warranted that the equip- ment was fit for Caveat's particular needs. A respon- sible officer of Prot read the contract and directed that the equipment be shipped to Caveat. The equip- ment did not meet the special needs of Caveat, and Caveat refused to pay for it. Profit sued Caveat for the contract price. 'Nho will win this case and why