17. Halbman, a minor, purchased a 2013 used car from Lemkefor $11,250. Under the terms of the contract, Halbman wouldpay $1,000 down and the balance in $250 weekly installments.Halbman purchased the car as a way to get around and havesome fun. Upon making the down payment, Halbman receivedpossession of the car, but Lemke retained the title until thebalance was paid. After Halbman had made his first fourpayments, a connecting rod in the car's engine broke. Lemkedenied responsibility but offered to help Halbman repair theengine if Halbman would provide the parts. Halbman, however, placed the car in a garage where the repairs cost $1,637.40.Halbman never paid the repair bill.Hoping to avoid any liability for the vehicle, Lemke transferred title to Halbman even though Halbman never paid thebalance owed. Halbman returned the title with a letter disaffirming the contract and demanded return of the moneypaid. Lemke refused. As the repair bill remained unpaid, thegarage removed the car's engine and transmission and towedthe body to Halbman's father's house. Vandalism during theperiod of storage rendered the car unsalvageable. Several timesHalbman requested Lemke to remove the car. Lemke refused.Halbman sued Lemke for the return of his consideration, andLemke countersued for the amount still owed on the contract.

Decision?

tell me what the case is about in "your own" words."

Identify & explain "rule of law" (Review the "homework aid" for this assignment first).

Explain how the "rule of law" applies to this case; use facts from the case and concepts from the related chapter

Use critical thinking skills to effectively detail the main points leading to your conclusion.

Come to a final conclusion using "legal reasoning." (Come to "one" final conclusion. Do not speculate on the what if's; be decisive).