Question
1.AaronLN Associates is a holding company that specializes in buying out small to medium-sized companies. The company is currently considering the purchase of three companies:
1.AaronLN Associates is a holding company that specializes in buying out small to medium-sized companies. The company is currently considering the purchase of three companies: Ashley Textiles (hereafter A), Bouchard Mills (hereafter B), and Copps textiles (hereafter C). The main criteria the company uses to determine which companies it will purchase are current profitability and growth potential. In making the purchase decision, the growth potential is moderately to strongly preferred by the company over profitability. Using the preference scale shown in table 1, AaronLN Associates pairwise comparisons for the three target companies are given below for each criterion (growth potential, profitability), respectively.
| Growth Potential |
|
| Profitability | ||||
Company | A | B | C |
| Company | A | B | C |
A | 1 | 1/2 | 1/5 |
| A | 1 | y | 7 |
B | 2 | 1 | 1/3 |
| B | 3 | 1 | 9 |
C | x | 3 | 1 |
| C | 1/7 | 1/9 | z |
Table 1: Preference scale for pairwise comparisons
Use the problem statement above and provide answers to the following questions:
(a) Complete the missing information in each of the above pairwise comparison matrices, i.e., what should be the values of x, y, and z in the tables above? (4 points)
(note: no fraction, enter each entry with 3 decimals, e,g. 1.000)
X=?, Y=?, Z=?
Note: do your draft work elsewhere and only submit the interim/final results in the reserved cells provided in each of the following tables shown below b) develop an overall ranking of the three companies under consideration using AHP (i.e., compute for each company its overall score and provide its position in the ranking using a decreasing order) - (12 points)
1) determine weight for each company for each criteria (keep three decimals for each entry)
Pairwise comparisons for growth potential criteria (2 points)
| Normalized | |||
Company | A | B | C |
weight (row average) |
A |
|
|
| Answer |
B |
|
|
| Answer |
C |
|
|
| Answer |
Pairwise comparisons for profitability criteria (2 points)
| Normalized | |||
Company | A | B | C | weight (row average) |
A |
|
|
| Answer |
B |
|
|
| Answer |
C |
|
|
| Answer |
2) determine weight for each criteria (no fraction and enter each entry with three decimals, e.g., 2.000), where G=growth potential and P = profitablity, (5 points)
| Standard |
|
| Normalized | |||
Criteria | G | P |
|
| G | P | weight (row average) |
G | Answer | Answer |
| G |
|
| Answer |
P | Answer | Answer |
| p |
|
| Answer |
3) develop the overall score (enter each entry with decimals) for each company as well as the overall ranking (enter the position with 1 being the first, 2 the second, and 3 the third) - 3 points
Company | Overall score |
| Overall ranking |
A | Answer |
| Answer |
B | Answer |
| Answer |
C | Answer |
| Answer |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started