1.Britney is a famous social media influencer who purchases a bicycle from NYC Bikes, Inc. UCHT Handles is a corporation that makes handlebars that it sells to NYC Bikes, Inc., which then installs them on their bikes. One set of handlebars is defective, which an inspection would reveal. NYC Bikes does not inspect the handlebars. The bike with the defective han-dlebars is sold to a local bike shop, which sells the bike to Britney. Soon, Britney is injured in an accident caused by the defective handlebars. Angry about the accident she posts a series photos of her injuries and captioned with messages blasting NYC Bikes and saying that the she was injured while using their product. She sues NYC Bikes who makes counterclaims against her for defamation. A Does Britney have a valid claim against NYC Bikes? B Does NYC Bikes have a valid claim against Britney? C Are there any other claims here besides the two mentioned?

2. After suffering her injury Britneys condition continues to deteriorate. She ends up staying with her friend, Stella, upon whom she ultimately becomes completely reliant because of her injuries. Stella tells Britney that if she wishes her to continue to take care of her then she must contract to transfer title to her fabulous Miami apartment to Stella. Britney does so but imme-diately regrets doing so. Stella then enlists her friend CC to renovate that Miami apartment. In order to renovate CC must purchase specific equipment. Stella promises the equipment sales company that CC locates that she will pay for the equipment needed for the renovation and that CC is purchasing on credit if the CC fails to pay the debt. A. What type of contract do Britney and Stella have for the Miami apartment? B. Does Britney have any recourse against Stella? If so, why, and what type of remedy would that be? If not, why not? C. With respect to Britneys promise what is Britney promising to do here? Must this promise be in writing to be enforceable? If so, why? If not, why not?