Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1-Compare and contrast factual causation and legal causation.Why must the defendant be both the factual and legal/proximate cause of the harm in order for him

1-Compare and contrast factual causation and legal causation.Why must the defendant be both the factual and legal/proximate cause of the harm in order for him to have liability.When will intervening variables cut off liabiliy?Please give examples.

2-what are the four types of mens rea found in the Model Penal Code.Define each and give an example.

3-Under what circumstances can an omission to act be deemedthe actusreus of a crime.Please provide examples

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Smith and Robersons Business Law

Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts

17th edition

1337094757, 978-1337514408, 1337514403, 978-0357691571, 978-1337094757

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

6. How can a message directly influence the interpreter?

Answered: 1 week ago