1.Critical theorists hold that "real accountability" can be achieved with minimal legislative change

True or False?

2.The role of SEA under the stakeholder-accountability approach has nothing in common with traditional accounting.

True or False?

3.Current SEA reporting is as rigorous and reliable as current financial reporting.

True or False?

4.Critical theorists believe that SEA should expose the basic contradictions and the exploitative nature of capitalism.

True or False?

5.Some companies engage in SEA only to improve their corporate image

True or False?

6.Adherents to the business case for SEA see SEA as a way of managing threats to organizational legitimacy

True or False?

7.Companies that engage in stakeholder dialogue

Select one:

a. Will always be more trustworthy than those that do not

b. Will sometimes be more trustworthy than those that do not

c. Never be more trustworthy than those that do not

8.Adherents to the business case for SEA are generally unwilling to acknowledge that there are situations where economic and social responsibilities come into conflict.

True or False?

9.The ordering that best illustrates the continuum of different approaches to SEA is

Select one:

a. Business case -Stakeholder accountability case - Critical theorist case

b. Stakeholder accountability case - Business case - Critical theorist case

c. Business case -Critical theorist case-Stakeholder accountability case

10.Brown and Frazer compare

Select one:

a.The business case and the stakeholder accountability approach to Social and Environmental Accounting (SEA)

b.The business case, the stakeholder accountability approach and the critical theory approach to SEA

c.The business case and the critical theory approach to SEA