1.Highlight the pertinent facts;

2.Identify the issue of law posed by the case problem. This will be in

the form of a question based on a legal concept from the chapter.

3.What should be the decision in the case? (i.e. the answer to the issue).

4.The reasoning for such decision.

Minth is the owner of the Hiawatha Supper Club, which he leased for

two years to Piekarski. During the period of the lease, Pietarski

contracted with Puttkammer for the resurfacing of the access and

service areas of the supper club. Puttkammer performed the work

satisfactorily. Minth knew about the contract and the performance of

the work. The work, including labor and materials, had a reasonable

value of $2,540, but Puttkammer was never paid because Piekarski

went bankrupt. Puttkammer brought an action against Minh to recover

the amount owed to him by Piekarski. Will Puttkammer prevail?

Explain