1.In large part, the legislation followed state liability statutes, defining trade secrets in the same manner as the Uniform Trade Secrets Act does?

2."all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes?

3.However, the legislation differs from previous law in many significant ways?

4.Trade secret claims may be tried in federal courts with procedural benefits since it is a federal statute?

5.It includes the unique remedy of preliminary seizure of "property required to prevent the proliferation or dissemination of the trade secret," as well as other provisions. 18 U.S.C. 1836, 18 U.S.C. 1836, 18 U.S.C. 1836?

6.In instances of "willful and malicious" appropriation, it allows for royalties in suitable cases and exemplary damages up to two times the actual damages, 18 U.S.C. 1836(b) (3)?

7.The DTSA further specifies that a US resident (including a corporation) may be held responsible for misappropriation that occurs outside the US?

8. And that any person can be held liable if an act in furtherance of the misappropriation occurs in the US, 18 U.S.C. 1837?

9. The DTSA gives the courts extensive injunctive authority. 1836(b) of the United States Code (3)?

10.The DTSA does not preempt or replace state laws; rather, it adds a new cause of action to the mix. Because states use different approaches to the "inevitable disclosure" concept, its applicability under the DTSA, 18 U.S.C?