1.In this case, the plaintiff was a group of businesses who raised constitutional challenges to the passage of the Affordable Care Act.Essentially, the ACA required individuals to purchase health insurance or pay a fee.The government defended the law and argued that it was a permissible exercise of federal power under the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Taxation Clause.Under which clause did the individual mandate portion of the ACA survive?

2.This case was a 5-4 decision (meaning that 5 of the justices wrote the majority opinion but 4 justices disagreed) that was split along political lines.After reading the majority and the dissenting opinions,