1.John and Peter-representatives of two negotiating parties from two different countries-bring in an outsider-Paul-to broker a deal between the warring parties. If Peter's opinion binds legally, the process is called _____.

a.arbitration

b.picketing

c.mediation

d.boycotting

e.field warehousing

2.Otto Reutter, a German exchange student at Maryland University, was accused of hacking into the university's website. The district court of Maryland claimed that Otto's actions had a considerable impact on the university's privacy policy. Which of the following validates the district court's claim?

a.The nationality jurisdiction principle

b.The blue-sky principle

c.The stare decisis doctrine

d.The res judicata doctrine

e.The territorial principle

3.Thomas Sumner, a U.S. citizen from Minnesota, was accused of murder in Russia. Sumner claimed that only the district court of Minnesota can try him. The _____ validates Sumner's claim.

a.nationality jurisdiction principle

b.blue sky principle

c.territorial principle

d.stare decisis doctrine

e.res judicata doctrine

4.When an illegal act taking place within the borders of one nation can have a direct and foreseeable impact on another nation, the principle of _____ comes into play.

a.res judicata

b.tippee doctrine

c.nationality jurisdiction

d.objective territoriality

e.delectus personae