1.Louis Limited is currently gaining Lethal Limited on a

share trade premise. Following important information are accessible:

Louis

Restricted

Scope

Restricted

Benefit after Tax (PAT)

Number of Shares

Procuring per Share (EPS)

Value Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio)

(Overlook Synergy) $ in millions

millions

140 155 10

You are needed to decide:

(I) Pre-consolidation Market Value per Share, and

(ii) The greatest trade proportion Louis Limited can offer without the weakening of

(1) EPS and

(2) Market Value per Share

Ascertain Ratio/s up to four decimal focuses and sums and number

of offers up to two decimal focuses.

2.Consideration in an agreement :

a) May be past, present or future c) Must be available as it were.

b) May be available or future as it were. d) Must be future as it were.

3.Past Consideration is legitimate in -

a) England Only c) Neither in England nor in India

b) India just d) both in England and India.

4.Agreement without thought is legitimate, when made :

a) Out of adoration and fondness due to approach relationship

b) To pay a period banished obligation.

c) To repay an individual who has effectively accomplished something willfully.

d) All of the abovementioned.

5.A obligation banished by limit can't be recuperated. Consequently, a guarantee to pay such an obligation is

with no thought and thus invalid.

a) True c) False

b) Partly True d) None of the abovementioned.

6.Inadequacy of thought doesn't ruin an agreement.

a) True c) False

b) Partly True d) None of the abovementioned.

7.If just a piece of the thought or item is unlawful, the Contract is :-

a) Valid to the degree the equivalent are legal

b) Void to the degree the equivalent are unlawful.

c) Valid in general

d) Void in general.

8.The articulation "Privity of agreement" signifies -

a) A Contract will be Contract between the gatherings as it were.

b) A Contract is a private report

c) Only private reports can be contracts

d) The contacts might be communicated in some typical and sensible way.

9.Under the Indian Contract Act, a third individual -

a) Who is the recipient under the Contract can sue

b) From whom the thought has continued can sue

c) Can not sue regardless of whether the thought has continued from him.

d) Can not sue at all for need of privity of agreement.

10.In India, an individual who is more abnormal to the Consideration :

a) Can sue dependent on the Contract

b) Can not sue dependent on the Contract

c) Can sue contingent upon the Conditions

d) Can sue whenever allowed by the court