Question
1.Read the case of Ueda v Ecruising Pty Ltd https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCATCD/2014/30.html for the following: a)What was represented regarding the migration b)Why did the Tribunal make no
1.Read the case ofUeda v Ecruising Pty Ltdhttps://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCATCD/2014/30.html for the following:
a)What was represented regarding "the migration"
b)Why did the Tribunal make no case against the second respondent?
c)Why did the applicants not make out, on the balance of probabilities, that the itinerary was poorly planned?
d)Under what sections of the ACL was the case heard and what were the outcomes in relation to those sections?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Smith and Robersons Business Law
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
17th edition
1337094757, 978-1337514408, 1337514403, 978-0357691571, 978-1337094757
