1.The decision in the case of: Tooth & Co v Laws [1888] 9 LR (NSW) 154 was based on the fact that:

Select one:

a. failure to remove his name from the hotel meant he was liable for all bills

b. the previous licensee is always held liable for payment

c. allowing his name to remain over the front door and failure to notify the suppliers of the sale of the hotel, gave the impression that the purchasers were his agents

d. this was normal business practice in the hotel industry

2.

In a legal problem-solving context, case law:

Select one: a. Is used to formulate the relevant legal principle where there is no relevant legislation b. Is used to assist in the interpretation of legislation where there is relevant legislation c. Should be applied based on the doctrine of precedent d. All of the above