1.What did Case view as "the only possible consideration" for his agreement to reimburse UPI for some of the cost of his employment-related education?

2.How did the court interpret Case's view of "the only possible consideration"? Why?

3.If UPI had simply offered to pay its employees' wages and training expenses during their participation in a program of instruction "subject entirely and exclusively to UPI's approval," would the element of bargained-for exchange have been met? Explain.