1.Why should the commercial constitute an offer? Argue that it did.

2.Did both Leonard and Pepsi give consideration? If yes, what consideration did Leonard give? What consideration did Pepsi give?

3.Does Pepsi have any viable defenses (e.g., fraud, duress, violation of public policy) against the creation of a contract? What are arguments against these defenses? Remember, as Leonard's representative you don't want Pepsi to present any viable defenses.