2) a well known construction company made a 5 year contract for the construction of a bridge with a sub contracting company. While the contract was officially formulated the contracting company set up a requirement list to the sub contracting company which was submitted by the sub contracting company. After one year the contracting company is setting up another requirement list, which includes some extra documents to be submitted by the sub contracting company. The subcontracting company refused to submit the documents commenting that the new requirements of documents were not initially mentioned while the contract was formulated. The contracting company filed a case in court. If there are minutes of meeting counter signed by both parties is available to be produced in the court will that be accepted as a formal evidence in court also Develop the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved in this case and come up with a conclusion in the case with justifying Bahrain law (10 marks)