2 (a)JohnstalDavibaltep a i$1 50, 0fo0 hifarin20Qanthatbelievesworth twidbatttheresaitBelyingobese statem,Dubbalyth Carifro john som $225, 00minschimba$150, cfoohcarin 2004, but its value has increased only slightly, and itispresentdvor$800, OO@discovering thiDavoffeterecontharidohnson anduefotheetuomi$225, OBOsalt (b) Modthyfacts(a) byassumingjohnson hadai#00, fooh properDooWhat result (a) Decision for Jomsay, Davis is not entitledto theretum of his $225000 as long as Johnsonactually believed his farmwas worthapproximately $300,000. Jamsons statement with respect to the value of the famwas merely the expression of an opinion and not the statement of a material fact upon which Davis hadaright to rely. There is no indication of an appraisal or other expat opinion upon which Johnson's opinion is based (b) Decision for Davis. Johnsails statement to Divis that he paid $150,000 for the farmwasnintratatemotamateriadupowhidbavhadrightand didrely