(2) Consider the encounters that others (people you know or may not know) have with the law. When have the ethics (or rightness and wrongness) of these encounters been blurry? When are they clear? Why do you think this is so?

(3) What specifically from the Rowe reading speaks the fact that the law is not always clear cut? Where are there grey areas in the law? What impact can this have on an attorney, his or her clients, the legal system as whole, or the legal profession? Why might this be important to think about for those planning to attend law school and for individuals on a personal level?