2. Defendant, a California corporation, published a tabloid magazine. The Defendant published a defamatory story about Plaintiff, from New York, in its tabloid magazine. Plaintiff filed an action against Defendant in New Jersey state court. Defendant routinely sells several thousand copies of its magazine in New Jersey. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. How the court should rule on Defendant's motion to dismiss? A. The court should deny the motion because the facts readily satisfy the Court's test for specific jurisdiction. B. The court should grant the motion because Defendant did not \"target" Plaintiff in New Jersey. C. The court should grant the motion because New York has no interest in providing a forum for an outofstate plaintiff. D. The court should grant the motion because Defendant is not \"at home" in New Jersey