2. lCity Library Performance Measures (2007-2010) 35,544 38,039 41,093 43,247 Hours open per week 56 50 Book budget per capita $1 05 $1.10 $1.15 $1.40 Library materials circulated 187 481 188 203 188,050 167,365 111,550 110.939 121.157 103.491 Annual customer satisfaction survey it of - resPodems 1 500 1 34s 1 256 1 243 Please refer to the above table and answer the following questions: 'P 2 (a): What does the table tell us about performance of the city's library? The Table tell me the Materials in collection increase from 2007 to 2008 by 2,527, decrease in 2009 by 464 then increased in 2010 by 9,000. Borrowers registered increase every year. Hours open per week remained constant for 3 years and dropped by 6 in 2010. Book budget per capita increased by $5 cent for the first 3 years and leaped to $.25 cent in 2010. Library materials circulated increase from 2007 to 2008 by 722 and in 2009 dropped by 153 and in 2010 big drop by 20,685. Patron visits was 111,550 2007 decreased by 611 in 2008, increase by 10,228 in 2009 then plunged by17,676 in 2010. And for the Annual customer satisfaction survey # of respondents- we can see the number of respondends decreased. Started with 1500 in 2007 dropped by 152 in 2008, then by 92 in 2009 then slightly decreased again in 2010 by 13. 33' 2 (b): In your opinion, what kind of performance information is useful in this table? b 2 (c): How could these performance measures be used in budget decisions