Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

2. Southeast Corporation On January 6, 1984, Lori Hiratani, treasurer of the Southeast Corporation, reviewed a financial analysis of a plan to build an automated

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

2. Southeast Corporation On January 6, 1984, Lori Hiratani, treasurer of the Southeast Corporation, reviewed a financial analysis of a plan to build an automated manufacturing facility near Southeast's Atlanta headquarters. Southeast Corporation's management committee had approved construction of the facility late in 1983, and had authorized the issuance of $60 million in long-term debt to finance the project. Although Hiratani considered current borrowing rates to be particularly attractive, she planned to defer issuance of additional debt until the new facility had been completed in August 1984. She believed that completion of the project would improve the company's credit rating enabling Southeast to secure a Aa rating on the planned $60 million debt issue. Despite the potential for improvement in the quality of its credit, Hiratani realized that Southeast's total borrowing costs could increase substantially from the current 12.88% Aa rate if long-term interest rates moved against her over the succeeding seven months. In order to lock in the attractive current borrowing rates, Hiratani decided to hedge her August 1984 debt issue by selling short Treasury bond futures contracts. On January 6, September 1984 T-bond futures prices were quoted at 69-08. Hiratani had determined that this price reflected delivery of the 12% coupon Treasury bond maturing August 1, 2013. This "cheapest-to-deliver" bond was callable after August 1, 2008, and was priced in the cash market at 101-18 (an 11.80% yield). Hiratani estimated the duration of this T-bond at 8.5 years. The $60 million Southeast debt offering, scheduled to be issued the first week in August, was to carry a maturity of 25 years and sinking fund provisions requiring retirement of 10% of the issue each year beginning in year 20. Assuming the bonds were issued at current coupon levels, the duration of this obligation would equal 7.8 years. As she planned her hedge, Hiratani reviewed a variety of data concerning historical movements in the prices and yields of long Treasury and Aa corporate bonds (see Exhibits 1 and 2). 1. How many September 1984 T-bond futures contracts should Lori Hiratani sell short to hedge Southeast's interest rate exposure? 2. What rate will Hiratani "lock in" by initiating this hedge? 3. Does this hedging strategy eliminate Southeast's exposure? If not, what risks remain? Exhibit 1 Southeast Corporation 1983 Interest Rates T-Bonds vs. As Corporates 13 12.8 12.6 who 12.4 - 12.2 Rate (%) 124 11.8 11.6 11.4 - where 11.2 - 11 - 10.8 10.64 10.4 J FM M J J A S O N D 1983 Ag New Industrials O T-Bonds + Aa Corporate-Treasury Spreads 1983 140 130 120 110 100 - 90 Spread (Basis Points) - m 80 704 yonu 60 50 40 30 - 20+ J F M A M J S o ND J 1983 Source: Salomon Brothers, Inc. Exhibit 2 Southeast Corporation Aa New Indust vs. T-Bond Rates Weekly Data, 1/1-12/31/1983 13 12.8 12.6 - 12.4 12.2 12 New Ag Corporate Bond Rate (7) 11.8 - 11.6 11.4 11.2 11 DE 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.6 11.8 12 11.2 11.4 T-Bond Rate (%) Regression of Aa Industrial Bond Rates on Treasury Bond Rates Weekly Data: 171783 - 12731733 Aa Rate -.5808 1.123 (T-Bond Rate) (.047) Standard Error: (.5341) 2 R .9184 Source: Salomon Brothers, Inc. Exhibit 3 Southeast Corporation, Treasury Bill Yields, January 6, 1984 Maturity Investment Yield (%) 9.19% 9.61 3-Month 6-Month 9-Month One Year 9.75 10.10 Source: Wall Street Journal 2. Southeast Corporation On January 6, 1984, Lori Hiratani, treasurer of the Southeast Corporation, reviewed a financial analysis of a plan to build an automated manufacturing facility near Southeast's Atlanta headquarters. Southeast Corporation's management committee had approved construction of the facility late in 1983, and had authorized the issuance of $60 million in long-term debt to finance the project. Although Hiratani considered current borrowing rates to be particularly attractive, she planned to defer issuance of additional debt until the new facility had been completed in August 1984. She believed that completion of the project would improve the company's credit rating enabling Southeast to secure a Aa rating on the planned $60 million debt issue. Despite the potential for improvement in the quality of its credit, Hiratani realized that Southeast's total borrowing costs could increase substantially from the current 12.88% Aa rate if long-term interest rates moved against her over the succeeding seven months. In order to lock in the attractive current borrowing rates, Hiratani decided to hedge her August 1984 debt issue by selling short Treasury bond futures contracts. On January 6, September 1984 T-bond futures prices were quoted at 69-08. Hiratani had determined that this price reflected delivery of the 12% coupon Treasury bond maturing August 1, 2013. This "cheapest-to-deliver" bond was callable after August 1, 2008, and was priced in the cash market at 101-18 (an 11.80% yield). Hiratani estimated the duration of this T-bond at 8.5 years. The $60 million Southeast debt offering, scheduled to be issued the first week in August, was to carry a maturity of 25 years and sinking fund provisions requiring retirement of 10% of the issue each year beginning in year 20. Assuming the bonds were issued at current coupon levels, the duration of this obligation would equal 7.8 years. As she planned her hedge, Hiratani reviewed a variety of data concerning historical movements in the prices and yields of long Treasury and Aa corporate bonds (see Exhibits 1 and 2). 1. How many September 1984 T-bond futures contracts should Lori Hiratani sell short to hedge Southeast's interest rate exposure? 2. What rate will Hiratani "lock in" by initiating this hedge? 3. Does this hedging strategy eliminate Southeast's exposure? If not, what risks remain? Exhibit 1 Southeast Corporation 1983 Interest Rates T-Bonds vs. As Corporates 13 12.8 12.6 who 12.4 - 12.2 Rate (%) 124 11.8 11.6 11.4 - where 11.2 - 11 - 10.8 10.64 10.4 J FM M J J A S O N D 1983 Ag New Industrials O T-Bonds + Aa Corporate-Treasury Spreads 1983 140 130 120 110 100 - 90 Spread (Basis Points) - m 80 704 yonu 60 50 40 30 - 20+ J F M A M J S o ND J 1983 Source: Salomon Brothers, Inc. Exhibit 2 Southeast Corporation Aa New Indust vs. T-Bond Rates Weekly Data, 1/1-12/31/1983 13 12.8 12.6 - 12.4 12.2 12 New Ag Corporate Bond Rate (7) 11.8 - 11.6 11.4 11.2 11 DE 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.6 11.8 12 11.2 11.4 T-Bond Rate (%) Regression of Aa Industrial Bond Rates on Treasury Bond Rates Weekly Data: 171783 - 12731733 Aa Rate -.5808 1.123 (T-Bond Rate) (.047) Standard Error: (.5341) 2 R .9184 Source: Salomon Brothers, Inc. Exhibit 3 Southeast Corporation, Treasury Bill Yields, January 6, 1984 Maturity Investment Yield (%) 9.19% 9.61 3-Month 6-Month 9-Month One Year 9.75 10.10 Source: Wall Street Journal

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Money Book Of Personal Finance

Authors: Richard Eisenberg

1st Edition

0446524298, 9780446524292

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What is the purpose of a firewall?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What is the difference between a CPU and a GPU?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What are the various principles of material handling ?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Explain the process planning.

Answered: 1 week ago