(20 points) In several cases, we have seen concern over a broad use of commerce clause authority. Why is the Supreme Court worried about an overly broad interpretation of the commerce power? What is one case where this concern was raised and how did it impact the court's conclusion? And provide one example of how a broad interpretation of commerce authority may have benefited public health and one example of how a narrow interpretation may have harmed public health.

Instructions for your tutor:

Dear tutors, please include only any of these cases as examples for these questions, because can't include out of syllabus cases. 1)Wickard V Filburn 2)US V. Lopez 3) Gonzales V. Raich 4)South Dakota V Dole 5)NFIB V Sebelius