Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

21. As the court indicated in Martin v. Parrish , a. a faculty member's language in a class, no matter how profane, is defensible under

21. As the court indicated in Martin v. Parrish,

a. a faculty member's language in a class, no matter how profane, is defensible under the First Amendment

b. part of judging a faculty member's language in a class, no matter how profane, is its academic purpose

c. faculty have no responsibility to teach civility to students in class

d. the American Association of University Professors should be the arbiter of a complaint regarding the appropriateness of a faculty member's language in class

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Dynamic Business Law The Essentials

Authors: Nancy K. Kubasek, M. Neil Browne, Daniel J. Herron, Lucien Dhooge Sue

3rd edition

007802384X, 1260247899, 9781260247893, 978-0078023842

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Statistical Evaluation of Errors using IDEA Monetary Unit Sampling

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. How do I perform this role?

Answered: 1 week ago