21. Which of the following must a plaintiff prove to win a negligence case A. Duty, breach of duty and causation. B. Breach of duty only C. Duty and causation only D. Causation and damages. E. Duty, breach of duty, causation and damages 22. Clients who feel that they have suffered damages as a result of a professional's breach of his 's breach of his or her duty of care can bring a negligence case against the professional referred to as acase A Malfeasance B. Malpractice C. Mistake D. Physician liability E. Physician guilty 23. Which of the following is true regarding the duty that a business owes to customer? A. A business owes no duty to its customers other than to sell safe products B. A business owes an absolute duty to keep its customers safe and is strictly liable for any harm. C. A business only owes a minimal duty toward customers. D. A business owes a negligence per se duty toward customers E. A business has a duty of care to protect their customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known. 24. Which of the following are elements of causation? Actual cause and proximate cause. A. B. Actual cause and significant cause. Actual cause and clear cause. C. D. E. Proximate cause and significant cause. Proximate cause and real cause. 25. Why are punitive damages awarded? A To punish the offender only B. To deter others from committing similar offenses only. T reimburse ap plaintiff for his or her losses only. der andtodeter others from committing Sarlar Offenses. to reimbursea D. To punish the offender and to deter others from committing similar offenses. E. To punish the offender, to deter others from committing similar offenses and to reimburse a losses. plaintiff for his or her 26. When would a defendant use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur? A. To allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was the cause of the plaintiff's harm, even though there is no direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care. B. To allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was not th plaintiff's harm. . allow the judge and jury to presume the plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence D. To allow the judge and jury to presume the plaintiff destroyed evidence. E. None of the above 27. What does the term "negligence per se" mean literally? A. B. C. D. E. Pure negligence. Select negligence. Negligence in or of itself. Absolute wrongdoing. Allowable negligence