22. In his 2011 book, Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful, economist Dan Hamermesh claims that ugly people are discriminated against and over the course of a lifetime they are worse off by about $230,000. He says "It's a matter of simple prejudice. Most of us, regardless of our professed attitudes, prefer as customers to buy from better-looking sales people, as jurors to listen to better-looking attorneys, as voters to be led by better-looking politicians, as students to learn from better-looking professors." Hamermesh proposes that firms should be forced to pay people the same regardless of their beauty. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that we could actually measure beauty in such a way that we could enforce a law that required firms to pay unattractive people the same wage as attractive people. Suppose also that all firm owners have the prejudice Hamermesh claims, namely, the firm owners prefer to hire good looking people over others. Using basic supply and demand graphs for each labor market, show what would happen if such a law was put in place Who would benefit and who would lose from such a law