2.2.2.Discovery argues that - as a private company - it is not bound by the right to provide access to healthcare in section 27(1)(a) of the Bill of Rights. Discovery claims that only the state and other public bodies are bound by this right because to hold private companies bound would impose a severe financial burden on them and would limit its autonomy to act in the best interest of the company to pursue profits. Is this argument legally tenable? Provide a brief motivation for your answer with reference to the relevant provision of the Bill of Rights