25. For each situation, determine whether you think it should be covered by traditional contract law, quasi-contract, or promissory estoppel.

a.Jeffrey owned a 125-acre plot of land. He agreed to sell it to his daughter for $200,000. They put their complete agreement in writing and set a day for the closing, but when that date arrived, Jeffrey refused to say he had decided to sell the land to someone else. His daughter sued and asked the court to order her father to sell the land to her. What theory do you think her lawyer used?

b.Jeffrey owned a 125-acre plot of land. He frequently told his daughter that he wanted her to have it and agreed to her constructing a house on the land. She acquired a $200,000 mortgage and built her house, with her father doing a substantial part of the building work himself. However, he never gave her the title to the land, and several years later, they had a falling-out. She sued, asking the court to force her father to give her the title or to

296reimburse her for the $200,000 she expended in building the house. If the court were to help her, what theory do you think it would use?

c.John is in a car accident and is rushed, bleeding and unconscious, to the hospital. His wallet was lost in the accident, so there is no way to contact any relatives. He needs immediate surgery or he will die. The surgery is performed, and John recovers completely. When he gets the hospital bill, however, he refuses to pay, saying that he never agreed to the surgery. The hospital sued. What theory do you think it should use to try to recover its money?

This is the whole question, I got no more information