Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

3. A farmer contracted to sell 200 bushels of oranges to a wholesaler. An exceptionallycold season ensued, making the growing season a poor one as

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
3. A farmer contracted to sell 200 bushels of oranges to a wholesaler. An exceptionallycold season ensued, making the growing season a poor one as most of the crop was frost damaged. The farmer was only able to deliver only 100 bushels. The wholesaler claimed a breach of contract due to his being shorted 100 bushels. The farmer sued the wholesaler for payment on the 100 bushels, and the wholesaler counterclaimed for damages caused by the loss of the additional 100 bushels. What is the most likely decision of the court? O O A. The farmer could have taken steps to prevent the frost damage; he breached the contract, and gets nothing. O B. There is an industry-wide implied condition that natural causes could limit the amount of an agricultural product .. the wholesaler must pay for the 100 bushels and gets no credit on the rest. O C. The farmer breached the contract but he's entitled to be paid for the 100 bushels, less the amount of damages suffered by the wholesaler in not getting the full value of the bargain. O D. The farmer is entitled to collect on the 100 bushels and will be reimbursed for the 100 unproduced bushels by the government or by his crop loss insurance carrier.4. As she usually did, a regular customer left her car at her auto mechanic's shop afterhours with written instructions to "check and tune up the engine; make sure the brakes are good and working; examine the tires; also, check and repair all major systems because I am driving cross country next week." She did not see the mechanic or discuss with him the price or other details. When she picked up the car at the end of the next day, there was a bill for $650 on the dash board. All of the services and parts were listed, the work done was workmanlike, not defective and pertained to the areas in the instructions. She refused to pay, claiming that there was no agreement and that the mechanic should have called for advance approval. Can she be held responsible for contractual services performed? O A. No, because there is always an implication that the provider must get permission before doing work not approved. O B. Yes, because the circumstances and past practice established an implied contract based on mutual assent. O C. No, because a contract cannot be based on implications and guess wor O D. Yes, because she wanted the car to drive cross-country the following week

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Criminal Law

Authors: Emily Finch, Stefan Fafinski

8th Edition

1292295414, 978-1292295411

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Always have the dignity of the other or others as a backdrop.

Answered: 1 week ago